Miguel Soto v. Marco Antonio Hernandez et al
| MIGUEL SOTO |
| KA SING MOK, ANTONIO MARCO HERNANDEZ doing business as BIG FAMOUS BURGERS & MEXICAN, Marco Antonio Hernandez doing business as Big Famous Burgers and Mexican and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2021cv00279 |
| January 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff Miguel Soto pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Marco Antonio Hernandez. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Miguel Soto. correcting Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Party(ies) (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #16 (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by PLAINTIFF Miguel Soto pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Marco Antonio Hernandez. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: granting #14 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to Ka Sing Mok as Trustee for the Ka and Ling Mok Family Trust. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 5/14/2021. (lc)
|
| Filing 14 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Ka Sing Mok. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Daniel Omon Iyayi added to party Ka Sing Mok(pty:dft)) (Iyayi, Daniel) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court has reviewed the Response filed by Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel to the Courts Order to Show Cause. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility state law claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Miguel Sototo Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, #11 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing No Later Than January 28, 2021 why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim asserted in the Complaint. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 USC 1367 (c). (lc)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: ORDER REGARDING PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. The Court finds that there is good cause to institute a limited scheduling order concerning basic case prosecution for cases under the Americans With Disabilities Act involving physical barriers in places of public accommodation. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC ENUMERATED REQUIREMENTS AND DEADLINES THEREIN). The failure to comply with this Order in a particular case will result in a sanction of $300.00 payable to the clerk of the court within two weeks of Plaintiff being given notice of noncompliance and dismissal for lack of prosecution. The Court finds these sanctions sufficient and necessary to deter violations of the Order and to achieve timely prosecution of these cases without unnecessary intervention by the Court. (lc)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Marco Antonio Hernandez, Ka Sing Mok. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 MIGUEL SOTO. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MIGUEL SOTO. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30000081 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party MIGUEL SOTO(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
