James Shayler v. SS-CAL Pacific, Inc. et al
| James Shayler |
| Does 1-10 Inclusive and SS-CAL Pacific, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00305 |
| January 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant SS-CAL Pacific, Inc. served on 3/3/2021, answer due 3/24/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 17 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #15 as to Defendant SS-CAL Pacific, Inc. (lom) |
| Filing 16 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #15 filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 15 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff James Shayler(Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant SS-CAL Pacific, Inc. served on 1/26/2021, answer due 2/16/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi:MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. The Court has reviewed the Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Shaylerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive-form only-no proceeding held #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Shayler)(Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS (IN CHAMBERS) (ADA) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/27/2021. (smo)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order re Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans with Disabilities Act by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant SS-CAL Pacific, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30017800 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
