William Loftus v. Wilkins Investment Group, L.L.C., et al
| William Loftus |
| Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Wilkins Investment Group, L.L.C. doing business as Always Yes Properties |
| 2:2021cv00347 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #13 . Pursuant to the Court's March 9, 2021 Order dismissing this action for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with a Court order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court finds that Plaintiff has abandoned this action and failed to comply with the Court's Order. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with a Court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Yourish, 191 F.3d at 986-88; Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1260. The Court will issue a judgment consistent with this Order. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court finds Plaintiff's response to the Court's February 11, 2021 Order insufficient. The Court gives Plaintiff until March 8, 2021 to file an adequate response to the Court's Order. In the alternative, on or before March 8, 2021, the parties may file with this Court a notice of dismissal of this action or appear, telephonically with their clients, to place the settlement on the record. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff William Loftus. (Friedman, Todd) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson. (Show Cause Response due by 2/23/2021.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff William Loftus, upon Defendant Wilkins Investment Group, L.L.C. served on 1/20/2021, answer due 2/10/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Peter Diamond, Agent on behalf of Wilkins Investment Group LLC in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Friedman, Todd) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Wilkins Investment Group, L.L.C. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff William Loftus, (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff William Loftus. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff William Loftus. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30037629 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff William Loftus. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party William Loftus(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
