Scott Dormer v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc.
| Scott Dormer |
| Toyota Motor North America, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00419 |
| January 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Third STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Toyota Motor North America, Inc. answer now due 4/1/2021, filed by Defendant Toyota Motor North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Christopher Corba in Support of Third Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Chorba, Christopher) |
| Filing 18 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Scott Dormer, (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kazerounian, Seyed) |
Filing 17
INITIAL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (rrey)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING SECOND JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (DKT. #15 ) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. It HEREBY ORDERED that: The deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to March 19, 2021. To the extent Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, Plaintiffs opposition shall be due April 16, 2021, and Defendants Reply brief shall be due April 30, 2021. (lom)
|
| Filing 15 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint filed by Defendant Toyota Motor North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration of Christopher Chorba)(Chorba, Christopher) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT TO FEBRUARY 19, 2021 #9 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha (lc)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE Notice of filing of Notice of Removal of Action with State Court by Defendant Toyota Motor North America, Inc. filed by Defendant Toyota Motor North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Chorba, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nicholas Barthel counsel for Plaintiff Scott Dormer. Nicholas R. Barthel is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Scott Dormer. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Barthel, Nicholas) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jason A Ibey on behalf of Plaintiff Scott Dormer (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Attorney Jason A Ibey added to party Scott Dormer(pty:pla))(Ibey, Jason) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Pamela Erin Prescott on behalf of Plaintiff Scott Dormer (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Pamela Erin Prescott added to party Scott Dormer(pty:pla))(Prescott, Pamela) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Toyota Motor North America, Inc. answer now due 2/19/2021, filed by Defendant Toyota Motor North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration of Christopher Chorba)(Chorba, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christopher Chorba on behalf of Defendant Toyota Motor North America, Inc. (Chorba, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Lily Bu on behalf of Defendant Toyota Motor North America, Inc. (Attorney Lily Bu added to party Toyota Motor North America, Inc.(pty:dft))(Bu, Lily) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Scott Dormer, upon Defendant Toyota Motor North America, Inc. served on 12/17/2020, answer due 1/7/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daisey Montenegro, Authorized Person in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/29/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Toyota Motor North America, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Scott Dormer. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/20/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Toyota Motor North America, Inc., re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 1/15/2021. (Chorba, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Certificate and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Toyota Motor North America, Inc., identifying Toyota Motor Corporation. (Chorba, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Toyota Motor North America, Inc.. (Chorba, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California - Los Angeles County, case number 20STCV46318 Receipt No: ACACDC-30064588 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Toyota Motor North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Complaint, #2 Exhibit State Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit State Summons, #4 Exhibit State Notice of Assignment, #5 Exhibit Proof of Service of State Complaint and Summons, #6 Exhibit State Docket Sheet) (Attorney Christopher Chorba added to party Toyota Motor North America, Inc.(pty:dft))(Chorba, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
