James Moran v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP et al
James Moran |
Does 1 to 10 and Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP |
2:2021cv00427 |
January 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Steve Kim |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information: for attorney Geoffrey C Lyon counsel for Plaintiff James Moran. Changing address to 3605 Long Beach Blvd, Ste 311 Long Beach CA 90807. Filed by Plaintiff James Moran. (Lyon, Geoffrey) |
Filing 10 ORDER RE STAY PENDING MEDIATION/ARBITRATION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation #9 , the Court HEREBY ORDERS that this action is STAYED as to all parties until further order of the Court pursuant to 9 U.S.C. Section 3 (stay of proceedings pending arbitration pursuant to Federal Arbitration Act). The parties shall proceed with mediation and, if necessary, binding arbitration of all claims in the Complaint as provided in the ADR Program. Frito-Lay will bear the mediator's expenses of mediation. The parties are ORDERED to file appropriate dismissal papers within seven days should the case be resolved in mediation. Otherwise, the parties are ORDERED to file post-arbitration Joint Status Report by 1/7/2022, and if necessary, a Stipulation for further action and an appropriate Proposed Order. (gk) |
Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Mediation/Arbitration filed by Defendant Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Berry, James) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 4/30/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #6 served on 1-20-2021. (Berry, James) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff James Moran. (filed in state court 12/8/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 2)(esa) |
Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP, identifying Frito-Lay Sales, Inc., General Partner of Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP; PepsiCo, Inc., Limited Partner of Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP; ultimate parent of Frito-Lay Sales, Inc.; ultimate parent of Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP. (Berry, James) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP. (Berry, James) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV46889 Receipt No: BCACDC-30065850 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint and related state court documents, #2 State Court Answer, #3 Appendix of Copies of State Court Pleadings and Process Served on Defendant; Defendants State Court Answer) (Attorney James H Berry, Jr added to party Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP(pty:dft))(Berry, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.