John Martinez v. Trojan Battery Company, LLC et al
Plaintiff: John Martinez
Defendant: Does 1-25, inclusive and Trojan Battery Company, LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv00436
Filed: January 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S Fischer
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 1 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar for Settlement Conference. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 12/14/21. (rfi)
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/7/2022 at 03:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 3/8/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
February 11, 2021 Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
February 10, 2021 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff John Martinez, re Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #12 served on 02/10/2021. (Boulad, Tariq)
February 10, 2021 Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Plaintiff John Martinez.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Joint 26(f) Report)(Boulad, Tariq)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 2/22/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
January 15, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
January 15, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car)
January 15, 2021 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Trojan Battery Company, LLC, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #5 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #6 , Declaration, #4 , Declaration, #3 served on 01/15/2021. (Cole, Kara)
January 15, 2021 Filing 6 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Trojan Battery Company, LLC, identifying Plaintiff - John Martinez; Defendant - Trojan Battery Company, LLC; Trojan Battery Holdings, LLC - Defendant's Sole Member; Joule AcqCo LLC - Trojan Battery Holdings, LLC's Sole Member; C&D Technologies, Inc. - Joule AcqCo LLC's Sole Member; Federal Insurance Company (Chubb) - Defendant's Insurer. (Cole, Kara)
January 15, 2021 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Defendant Trojan Battery Company, LLC's Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Trojan Battery Company, LLC identifying C&D Technologies, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Cole, Kara)
January 15, 2021 Filing 4 DECLARATION of Kara Cole re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Declaration of Kara Cole in Support of Defendant Trojan Battery Company, LLC's Notice of Removal of Civil Action to Federal Court filed by Defendant Trojan Battery Company, LLC. (Cole, Kara)
January 15, 2021 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Josh Bobrin re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Declaration of Josh Bobrin in Support of Defendant Trojan Battery Company, LLC's Notice of Removal of Civil Action to Federal Court filed by Defendant Trojan Battery Company, LLC. (Cole, Kara)
January 15, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Trojan Battery Company, LLC. (Cole, Kara)
January 15, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV46924 Receipt No: ACACDC-30070927 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Trojan Battery Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Complaint, #3 Answer to Complaint, #4 Proof of Service to Answer to Complaint) (Attorney Kara A Cole added to party Trojan Battery Company, LLC(pty:dft))(Cole, Kara)
January 15, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants John Martinez. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff John Martinez. Filed in State Court on 12/16/2020 Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
January 15, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Trojan Battery Company, LLC. Filed in State Court on 1/14/2021 Submitted with Attachment 3 to Notice of Removal #1 (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Martinez v. Trojan Battery Company, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Martinez
Represented By: Tariq I Boulad
Represented By: Anthony K McClaren
Represented By: Tariq Boulad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-25, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trojan Battery Company, LLC
Represented By: Jon C Yonemitsu
Represented By: Kara A Cole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?