Patricia Lynne Benton v. Andrew Saul
| Patricia Lynne Benton |
| Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul |
| 2:2021cv00463 |
| January 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| John E McDermott |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lynn M. Harada counsel for Defendant Andrew Saul. Lynn Harada is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Comissioner of Social Security. (Harada, Lynn)
|
|
Filing 13
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Timothy R Bolin counsel for Defendant Andrew Saul. Adding Timothy Bolin as counsel of record for Comissioner of Social Security for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Comissioner of Social Security. (Attorney Timothy R Bolin added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Bolin, Timothy)
|
|
Filing 12
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Lynn M. Harada added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Harada, Lynn)
|
|
Filing 11
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Patricia Lynne Benton. (Benavides, Francesco)
|
|
Filing 10
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Patricia Lynne Benton, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 2/1/2021, answer due 4/2/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Not legible. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Eddie Anderson. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Ronnie Oliver, Legal Assistant. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Return Receipts)(Benavides, Francesco)
|
|
Filing 9
60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (es)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: Granting #5 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) (es)
|
|
Filing 7
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. [See Order for details.] (san)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 5
REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Patricia Lynne Benton. (Benavides, Francesco)
|
|
Filing 4
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Patricia Lynne Benton. (Benavides, Francesco)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Patricia Lynne Benton, (Benavides, Francesco)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Patricia Lynne Benton. (Benavides, Francesco)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Patricia Lynne Benton. (Attorney Francesco P Benavides added to party Patricia Lynne Benton(pty:pla))(Benavides, Francesco)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
