G2 Secure Staff, LLC v. ABM Industries Inc. et al
| G2 Secure Staff LLC |
| Chiduweayi Egbuho, ABM Inustries Inc., ABM Industries Inc and Does 1 through 100 |
| 2:2021cv00631 |
| January 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| John F Walter |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 20STCV32158, acknowledged on 2/9/2021. (iv) |
| Filing 12 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court. (iv) |
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT by Judge John F. Walter. This action is REMANDED to Los Angeles Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (iv)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for March 1, 2021 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before February 16, 2021. (iv)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 100, inclusive.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to Adverse Party of Filing removal of action filed by defendant ABM Industries Inc. (Nowinski, Ivy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants ABM Inustries Inc., Does 1 through 100, Chiduweayi Egbuho., filed by Plaintiff G2 Secure Staff LLC. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/24/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant ABM Inustries Inc.. (Cunningham, Scott) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant ABM Inustries Inc., identifying no corporate parent; BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group Inc. own 10% or more of its stock. (Cunningham, Scott) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant ABM Inustries Inc. identifying none as Corporate Parent. (Cunningham, Scott) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV32158 Receipt No: ACACDC-30195274 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant ABM Inustries Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit state court complaint, #2 Exhibit state court Statement of Damages) (Attorney Scott D. Cunningham added to party ABM Inustries Inc.(pty:dft))(Cunningham, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
