Los Angeles Unified School District v. A.O.
| Los Angeles Unified School District |
| A.O. |
| 2:2021cv00757 |
| January 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 7422 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER ON PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR A.A. by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition of A.O. for appointment of Kateri Owens as her Guardian Ad Litem is Granted and that Kateri Owens is appointed as the Guardian Ad Litem of A.O., a minor, to defend and to prosecute the above-entitled action. #12 (es)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 7/19/2021 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: PETITION for Appointment of Kateri Owens as Guardian ad Litem for A.O. #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Missing proposed order. As an alternative, prepare and e-file a formal Notice of Lodging, to be docketed only under its specific event: Notice of Lodging, to which the formal proposed order is submitted as Separate Attachment thereto. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 12 PETITION for Appointment of Kateri Owens as Guardian ad Litem for A.O. filed by Defendant A.O.. (Menyuk, Eric) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant A.O., (Menyuk, Eric) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , COUNTERCLAIM against Los Angeles Unified School District filed by Defendant A.O..(Attorney Eric Menyuk added to party A.O.(pty:dft))(Menyuk, Eric) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II.. The Courts Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who havepending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submitdocuments electronically to the Clerks Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Courts Website and Judges procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant A.O. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (esa) |
| FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. ACACDC-30287202 for $402 filing fee. (Waterman, Mark) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. Other error(s) with document(s): Fees and Costs are required in a Federal Court. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Los Angeles Unified School District. (Waterman, Mark) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Los Angeles Unified School District, (Waterman, Mark) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Los Angeles Unified School District. (Waterman, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by Plaintiff Los Angeles Unified School District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Complaint) (Attorney Mark W Waterman added to party Los Angeles Unified School District(pty:pla))(Waterman, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Los Angeles Unified School District v. A.O. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Los Angeles Unified School District | |
| Represented By: | Amanda Jayne Cordova |
| Represented By: | Mark W Waterman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: A.O. | |
| Represented By: | Eric Menyuk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
