James Shayler v. Lees Dental Building, LLC et al
| JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, and James Shayler |
| DOES 1-10 Inclusive, LEES DENTAL BUILDING, LLC, a California limited liability company, Does 1-10, inclusive and Lees Dental Building, LLC |
| 2:2021cv00819 |
| January 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: granting #15 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to All Parties. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 6/1/2021. (et)
|
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Defendant, Lee's Dental Building LLC re Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form,, #20 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Application for Stay)(Kajioka, Atsushi) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS. Counsel shall lodge a proposed order by filing a notice of lodging and uploading the proposed order as an attachment to the notice, no later than 4:00 pm of 03/19/2021. Following the filing, counsel must send the pdf of the application and the proposed order to the Judge's chambers email in compliance with L.R. 5-4.4.2. Failure to timely submit the documents may result in the document stricken. (cch) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (yl) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Lees Dental Building, LLC, re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #16 served on 3.15.2021. (Kajioka, Atsushi) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Lees Dental Building, LLC, re APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #15 served on 03.11.2021. (Kajioka, Atsushi) |
| Filing 16 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Lees Dental Building, LLC answer now due 3/12/2021, filed by Defendant Lees Dental Building, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kajioka, Atsushi) |
| Filing 15 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Lees Dental Building, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration in support of extension of time to file responses and filing Application for Stay and Early Mediation) (Kajioka, Atsushi) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Application for Stay and Early Mediation: ADA Access Litigation filed by Defendant Lees Dental Building, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in support of extension of time to file responses and filing Application for Stay and Early Mediation)(Attorney Atsushi Kajioka added to party Lees Dental Building, LLC(pty:dft))(Kajioka, Atsushi) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/18/2021. (cch)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: For the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. Section 1367(c)(4). (bm)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Shaylerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Shayler)(Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Lees Dental Building, LLC served on 2/15/2021, answer due 3/8/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. The Court therefore orders plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim andany other state law claim asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than February 22, 2021. (iv)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Lees Dental Building, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30298790 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
