William Burns v. William Coursey et al
| William Burns |
| William Coursey and Michael C Earle |
| 2:2021cv00836 |
| January 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Order to Extend the 120 Day Deadline for Effecting Service on All Parties and Filing of Responsive Pleadings by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for effecting service on all parties and the deadline for DEFENDANTs to file responsive pleadings be set for July 1, 2021. re Notice of Settlement #10 (vm)
|
| Filing 11 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (vm) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff William Burns. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kielty, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff William Burns, upon Defendant William Coursey served on 2/14/2021, answer due 3/8/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Kielty, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants William Coursey, Michael C Earle. (hr) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #6 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Summons Request #3 , Notice to Counsel (CV-20a) Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program - optional html form #5 filed by Plaintiff William Burns. (Kielty, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff William Burns, (Kielty, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff William Burns. (Kielty, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff William Burns. (Kielty, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30303931 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff William Burns. (Attorney Thomas W Kielty added to party William Burns(pty:pla))(Kielty, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
