Nir Cohen v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
| Nir Cohen |
| Costco Wholesale Corporation, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive and Rowland Air, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00852 |
| January 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal filed on 3/5/2021 #14 , the Court hereby DISMISSES this action without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(I). Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #11 is DENIED as moot. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Nir Cohen. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Lebedev, Gennady) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #11 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Athanacio, Gayle) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #11 filed by Defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation, Rowland Air, Inc.. (Athanacio, Gayle) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation, Rowland Air, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 4/2/2021 at 09:30 PM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Athanacio, Gayle) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant. Rowland Air, Inc., identifying defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation; plaintiff Nir Cohen; and counsel for plaintiff Lebedev, Michael & Helmi, A P.L.C. (Athanacio, Gayle) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Rowland Air, Inc. identifying n/a as Corporate Parent. (Athanacio, Gayle) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Costco Wholesale Corporation answer now due 3/5/2021; Rowland Air, Inc. answer now due 3/5/2021, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.(Athanacio, Gayle) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation, served on February 2, 2021. (Athanacio, Gayle) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation Costco Wholesale Corporation, (Athanacio, Gayle) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (Athanacio, Gayle) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Rowland Air, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation in Los Angeles Superior Court on 12/24/2020, attached as Exhibit B. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 20STCV49155 Receipt No: ACACDC-30316293 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration, #3 Appendix, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Letter) (Attorney Cody B DeCamp added to party Costco Wholesale Corporation(pty:dft))(DeCamp, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
