Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company v. Thoroughbred Owners of California
| Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company |
| Thoroughbred Owners of California |
| 2:2021cv00986 |
| February 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company. Dismissal is WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Edelman, Scott) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company. correcting Sealed Document #18 , Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #13 , Proof of Service (subsequent documents), #8 (Attachments: #1 Corrected Proof of Service - Replacing Docket 8, #2 Corrected Proof of Service - Replacing Docket 13, #3 Corrected Proof of Service - Replacing Docket 18-2)(Jura, Perlette) |
| Filing 18 SEALED DOCUMENT Complaint and Exhibit A re Order on Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal #16 filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proof of Service)(Jura, Perlette) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company, upon Defendant Thoroughbred Owners of California served on 2/5/2021, answer due 2/26/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mary Forney, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jura, Perlette) |
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF CHURCHILL TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES COMPANY'S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF ITS COMPLAINT #6 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi (lc)
|
|
Filing 15
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:21-cv-00986 MCS(AFMx). (rn)
|
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company, re Notice (Other) #5 , Errata #12 served on February 3, 2021. (Jura, Perlette) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company. correcting Notice (Other) #5 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit As filed redacted complaint)(Edelman, Scott) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Thoroughbred Owners of California. (et) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (et) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company, re Sealed Declaration in SupportDeclaration, #7 , APPLICATION to file document Complaint; Ex. A to Complaint under seal #6 served on February 3, 2021. (Jura, Perlette) |
| Filing 7 SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION to file document Complaint; Ex. A to Complaint under seal #6 filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document Complaint, #2 Unredacted Document Ex. A to Complaint)(Jura, Perlette) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION to file document Complaint; Ex. A to Complaint under seal filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration Perlette M. Jura, #3 Declaration Chad Riney, #4 Redacted Document Complaint, #5 Redacted Document Ex. A to Complaint)(Attorney Perlette Michele Jura added to party Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company(pty:pla))(Jura, Perlette) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Constitutional Challenge filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Certifying Notice of Constitutional Challenge)(Edelman, Scott) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company. (Edelman, Scott) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company, identifying Churchill Downs Incorporated; Los Angeles Turf Club d/b/a Santa Anita Park; BlackRock, Inc.; Thoroughbred Owners of California. (Edelman, Scott) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company. (Edelman, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30374745 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Redacted Hub Agreement, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Bet America Letter, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Twinspires Letter, #4 Exhibit Ex. D - Demand for Arbitration, #5 Exhibit Ex. E - JAMS Streamlined Arbitration Rules & Procedures) (Attorney Scott A Edelman added to party Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company(pty:pla))(Edelman, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
