Gregory Franklin v. A.H. Martinez et al
Gregory Franklin |
J. Tingley, Correctional Officer J. Resendiz, J. Hernandez, R. Aguirre, J. Resendiz, E. Gollette, J. Makarade, S. Nave and A.H. Martinez |
2:2021cv00991 |
January 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Consuelo B Marshall |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 9 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: denying as moot #8 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. (hr) |
|
Filing 8 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Gregory Franklin. (bm) |
|
Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Gregory Franklin. (dts) |
|
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (jtil) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93). (jtil) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Gregory Franklin All Defendants, pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.