Marilyn Lee Brown v. Andrew Saul
| Marilyn Lee Brown |
| Andrew Saul |
| 2:2021cv01047 |
| February 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Annabelle J Yang added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Yang, Annabelle) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Marilyn Lee Brown, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 2/8/2021, answer due 6/8/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Deborah L. Stachel, Regional Chief Counsel, Office of the Regional Chief Counsel-Region IX. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Koenig, Andrew) |
Filing 7
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS): CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Andrew Saul. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Marilyn Lee Brown, identifying Joseph Graham. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Marilyn Lee Brown. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Marilyn Lee Brown. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30407827 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Marilyn Lee Brown. (Attorney Andrew Thomas Koenig added to party Marilyn Lee Brown(pty:pla))(Koenig, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marilyn Lee Brown v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Annabelle J Yang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marilyn Lee Brown | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Thomas Koenig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
