Bruce R. Sands v. Patricia V. Bradley
Bruce R. Sands, Jr. |
Patricia V. Bradley |
2:2021cv01114 |
January 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E McDermott |
James V Selna |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 SEALED DOCUMENT (Exhibit B to MTD) re Order on Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal #15 filed by Respondent Patricia V. Bradley.(Fillmore, Ashley) |
Filing 16 SEALED DOCUMENT (Exhibit A to MTD) re Order on Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal #15 filed by Respondent Patricia V. Bradley.(Fillmore, Ashley) |
Filing 15 SEALED - ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT (bm) |
Filing 14 SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION to file document (Exhibits A and B to MTD) under seal #13 filed by Respondent Patricia V. Bradley.(Fillmore, Ashley) |
Filing 13 EX PARTE APPLICATION to file document (Exhibits A and B to MTD) under seal filed by Respondent Patricia V. Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fillmore, Ashley) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 filed by Respondent Patricia V. Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of AUSA Ashley Fillmore, #2 Exhibit A (under seal), #3 Exhibit B (under seal), #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Certificate of Service) (Fillmore, Ashley) |
Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PETITIONER'S MOTION REQUESTING APPOINTMENT OF LEGAL COUNSEL (Docket No. 9) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: The Court finds that an evidentiary hearing is not necessary at this stage of the proceedings, and the interests of justice do not require the appointment of counsel. Accordingly, Petitioner's motion is DENIED without prejudice. [See document for details.] (es) |
Filing 10 Response to Government's Ex Parte Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's 2242 Petition #6 filed by Petitioner Bruce R. Sands, Jr. (es) |
Filing 9 Motion Requesting Appointment of Legal Counsel filed by petitioner Bruce R. Sands, Jr. (es) |
Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Bruce R. Sands, Jr. (es) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: Granting #6 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File. The government's response shall be filed on or before March 24, 2021. (et) |
Filing 6 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Respondent Patricia V. Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service) (Fillmore, Ashley) |
Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Bruce R. Sands, Jr.. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) #1 . Receipt number LA218536. (fr) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of Assistant United States Attorney Ashley Fillmore on behalf of Respondent Patricia V. Bradley. Assistant United States Attorney Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV terminated. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Attorney Ashley Fillmore added to party Patricia V. Bradley(pty:res))(Fillmore, Ashley) |
Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND INSTRUCTIONS GOVERNING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS (FEDERAL CUSTODY) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Respondent shall file an Answer to the Petition or a Motion to Dismiss the Petition not later than 28 days after the filing date of this Order. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorneys Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Attach 1 of 2, #2 Attach 2 of 2) (es) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 and CV-69) (ghap) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE), filed by petitioner Bruce R. Sands, Jr. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bruce R. Sands v. Patricia V. Bradley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Patricia V. Bradley | |
Represented By: | Ashley Fillmore |
Represented By: | Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Bruce R. Sands, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.