Carmen John Perri v. Santa Monica Investments, LLC et al
Plaintiff: CARMEN JOHN PERRI, an individual, and Carmen John Perri
Defendant: DOES 1-10 Inclusive, SANTA MONICA INVESTMENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company, Does 1-10, inclusive and Santa Monica Investments, LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv01131
Filed: February 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #17 . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Carmen John Perri ("Plaintiff") requests that this Court enter a dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-entitled action, in its entirety. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys' expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. (mrgo)
March 26, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Manning, Joseph)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court has been advised by counsel that this matter has settled #15 . The parties have ten (10) days from the date of this order or until the next scheduled court appearance, whichever is shorter, to file with the court a dismissal of the action or to appear, in-person or telephonically with their clients, to place the settlement on the record. See minute order for details. (lom) Modified on 3/16/2021 (lom).
March 15, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph)
February 24, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect case title. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (mrgo)
February 24, 2021 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, upon Defendant Santa Monica Investments, LLC served on 2/22/2021, answer due 3/15/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction- related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (iv)
February 23, 2021 Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perrito Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,,, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Perri)(Manning, Joseph)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of and alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. 12010-12213, and a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Civil Rights Act ("Unruh Act"), Cal. Civ. Code 51-53. It appears that the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, and any other state law claim that plaintiff may have alleged, pursuant to the Court's supplemental jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(a). Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than February 23, 2021. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS) (mrgo)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for details) (mrgo)
February 9, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (gga)
February 9, 2021 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Santa Monica Investments, LLC. (et)
February 9, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
February 9, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (et)
February 8, 2021 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff CARMEN JOHN PERRI, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph)
February 8, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff CARMEN JOHN PERRI, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph)
February 8, 2021 Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff CARMEN JOHN PERRI, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph)
February 8, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30452582 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff CARMEN JOHN PERRI, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party CARMEN JOHN PERRI, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carmen John Perri v. Santa Monica Investments, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10 Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SANTA MONICA INVESTMENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Santa Monica Investments, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CARMEN JOHN PERRI, an individual,
Represented By: Joseph Richard Manning, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carmen John Perri
Represented By: Joseph Richard Manning, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?