Michael D. Radford v. Vulcan Materials Company
Michael D. Radford |
DOES 1 through 150, inclusive and Vulcan Materials Company |
2:2021cv01135 |
February 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patricia Donahue |
Dolly M Gee |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10 days, filed by Defendant Vulcan Materials Company.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Joint Rule 26(F) Report)(Shigekawa, Anh) |
Filing 14 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Michael D. Radford, identifying D. Michael Radford. (Campbell, Darren) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Vulcan Materials Company, Notice of Standing Order and Scheduling Meeting of Counsel served on February 16, 2021. (Shigekawa, Anh) |
Filing 12 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/12/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 3/26/2021 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
![]() |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (jtil) |
Filing 8 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Patricia Donahue. New Case Number 2:21-cv-1135 DMG (PDx). (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Vulcan Materials Company in Los Angeles Superior Court on 2/3/2021, attached as Exhibit B. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Vulcan Materials Company in Los Angeles Superior Court on 1/5/2021, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Vulcan Materials Company, re Declaration #6 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Related Case(s) #5 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on February 5, 2021. (Shigekawa, Anh) |
Filing 6 DECLARATION of Philip Miller re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Vulcan Materials Company. (Shigekawa, Anh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Vulcan Materials Company. (Shigekawa, Anh) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Vulcan Materials Company (Shigekawa, Anh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Vulcan Materials Company, (Shigekawa, Anh) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Vulcan Materials Company. (Shigekawa, Anh) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 21STCV00313 Receipt No: ACACDC-30425519 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Vulcan Materials Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Answer to Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Other Documents Served with Complaint) (Attorney Anh Nguyen Shigekawa added to party Vulcan Materials Company(pty:dft))(Shigekawa, Anh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.