Miguel Soto v. Bullish, LLC, et al
MIGUEL SOTO |
HSUN FANG LING, BULLISH, LLC doing business as DOMESTIC and Does 1 to 10 |
2:2021cv01137 |
February 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E McDermott |
Mark C Scarsi |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Miguel Sototo Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive-form only-no proceeding held #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Bullish, LLC, Hsun Fang Ling. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (esa) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 MIGUEL SOTO. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MIGUEL SOTO. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30453040 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party MIGUEL SOTO(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.