Alexander Bayonne Stross v. NextLuxuryDotCom LLC
| Alexander Bayonne Stross |
| NextLuxuryDotCom LLC, Next Luxury LLC, DOES 1-10, inclusive and Brian Cornwell |
| 2:2021cv01181 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| James V Selna |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint/Petition #13 as to Defendant Next Luxury LLC. (es) |
| Filing 17 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint/Petition #13 as to Defendant Brian Cornwell. (es) |
| Filing 16 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #13 filed by Plaintiff Alexander Bayonne Stross. (Tehranian, John) |
| Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #13 filed by Plaintiff Alexander Bayonne Stross. (Tehranian, John) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Alexander Bayonne Stross, identifying Alexander Bayonne Stross, Plaintiff; NextLuxuryDotCom LLC, Defendant; Next Luxury LLC, Defendant; Brian Cornwell, Defendant. (Tehranian, John) |
| Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Next Luxury LLC, Brian Cornwell amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Alexander Bayonne Stross (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Tehranian, John) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to NextLuxuryDotCom LLC answer now due 4/8/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant NextLuxuryDotCom LLC.(Attorney John M Begakis added to party NextLuxuryDotCom LLC(pty:dft))(Begakis, John) |
Filing 11
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 5/3/2021 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 4/26/2021. (lb)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alexander Bayonne Stross, upon Defendant NextLuxuryDotCom LLC served on 2/16/2021, answer due 3/9/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service by serving Rose Garcia, Office Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Tehranian, John) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant NextLuxuryDotCom LLC. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Alexander Bayonne Stross. (Tehranian, John) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Alexander Bayonne Stross. (Tehranian, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Alexander Bayonne Stross, (Tehranian, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Alexander Bayonne Stross. (Tehranian, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30471980 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Alexander Bayonne Stross. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney John Tehranian added to party Alexander Bayonne Stross(pty:pla))(Tehranian, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
