Jeremy Holland v. Dina J. Nichols
| JEREMY HOLLAND |
| DINA J NICHOLS, Dina J. Nichols and DOES 1 to 10 |
| 2:2021cv01232 |
| February 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MINUTES - IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed on 3/25/2021 #15 , the Court hereby DISMISSES this action with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). The scheduling conference on 5/7/2021 is VACATED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by PLAINTIFF Jeremy Holland. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 14 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/23/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 5/7/2021 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint #1 filed by Defendant Dina J. Nichols.(gk) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint #10 . Having reviewed and considered Plaintiff's response to the Court's Order to Show Cause #11 , the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. The Court therefore dismisses the state law claims without prejudice. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jeremy Hollandto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, Order to Show Cause,,, #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, the negligence claim, and claims arising from the California Disabled Persons Act and the California Health & Safety Code. In responding to this Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff shall identify the amount of statutory damages Plaintiff seeks to recover. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by 2/26/2021. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and other state law claims, and the dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1367(c). Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Dina J Nichols. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 JEREMY HOLLAND. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JEREMY HOLLAND. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30492307 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party JEREMY HOLLAND(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
