Ubaldo Mio Gutierrez v. Rick M. Hill
| Ubaldo Mio Gutierrez |
| Rick M. Hill |
| 2:2021cv01255 |
| February 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE - OCMJ# 21-014 by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF THE CALENDAR of Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi, this case is transferred from the calendar of Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi for all further proceedings. All documents subsequently filed shall bear this new case designation 2:21-cv-01255 CAS(MAR). (rn)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why the Petition Should Not Be Dismissed as Second or Successive by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Petitioner is ORDERED to show cause in writing within twenty-eight (28) days why the Petition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (see document for details.) (es)
|
| Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Ubaldo Mio Gutierrez. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 . Receipt number LA218396. (fr) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 Notice Re: Discrepancies in Filing of Habeas Corpus Petition) (car) |
| Filing 3 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Ubaldo Mio Gutierrez. The Petitioner does not consent. (car) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Order for Discovery Pursuant to Rule 6 Habeas Corpus Rules filed by Petitioner Ubaldo Mio Gutierrez. (car) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick.(Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Ubaldo Mio Gutierrez. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ubaldo Mio Gutierrez v. Rick M. Hill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ubaldo Mio Gutierrez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Rick M. Hill | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
