Alexander Stross v. Deep Focus, Inc. et al
| Alexander Stross |
| DOES 1 through 10 and Deep Focus, Inc. a New York Corporation doing business as The Cassandra Report |
| 2:2021cv01261 |
| February 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| James V Selna |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Deep Focus, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Alexander Stross. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Alexander Stross. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Alexander Stross, identifying DEEP FOCUS, INC.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Alexander Stross. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30505816 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Alexander Stross. (Attorney Stephen M. Doniger added to party Alexander Stross(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
