Martin Vogel v. Bencron, Inc.
Plaintiff: Martin Vogel
Defendant: Bencron, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv01375
Filed: February 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The parties filed a notice of settlement on 4/5/2021 #9 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties are to show cause why the action should not be dismissed with prejudice on 6/11/2021 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. If the parties file a proposed order to dismiss the entire action with prejudice by 6/4/2021, the OSC shall be taken off calendar without further notice. Otherwise, the parties shall file a status conference report by June 4, 2021 and appear at the OSC hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other hearings and deadlines are vacated. (gk)
April 5, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock on behalf of Plaintiff Martin Vogel (Seabock, Amanda)
April 5, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement and request to vacate all currently set dates filed by plaintiff Martin Vogel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Seabock, Amanda)
March 30, 2021 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Martin Vogel, upon Defendant Bencron, Inc. served on 3/16/2021, answer due 4/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent For Service Of Process: Loretta Greenberg in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
February 18, 2021 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Bencron, Inc. (et)
February 18, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
February 18, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (et)
February 16, 2021 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Martin Vogel. (Handy, Russell)
February 16, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Martin Vogel, (Handy, Russell)
February 16, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Martin Vogel. (Handy, Russell)
February 16, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30555781 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Martin Vogel. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Martin Vogel(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin Vogel v. Bencron, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin Vogel
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bencron, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?