Aaron Klein v. Ralph Diaz et al
| Aaron Klein |
| Stephanie Clendenin, George Gascon and Ralph Diaz |
| 2:2021cv01430 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Denying Request for Appointment of Counsel by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Accordingly, Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is DENIED. #9 (et)
|
|
Filing 10
DECLARATION In Support of Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Aaron Klein. (et)
|
|
Filing 9
DECLARATION OF AARON KLEIN IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel filed by Petitioner Aaron Klein. (et)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application is GRANTED and Respondent may file a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed in this matter on or before April 27, 2021, or alternatively may file an Answer on or before May 12, 2021. #7 (es)
|
|
Filing 7
APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Declaration of Kenneth C. Byrne filed by Respondent Ralph Diaz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Byrne, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 6
FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Aaron Klein. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 . Receipt number LA219465. (jo)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Kenneth C. Byrne on behalf of Respondent Ralph Diaz. (Attorney Kenneth C Byrne added to party Ralph Diaz(pty:res))(Byrne, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Respondent shall file and serve an Answer to the Petition within 45 days of the date of this Order. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 3/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Petition 1 of 5, #2 Attachment Petitoon 2 of 5, #3 Attachment Petition 3 of 5, #4 Attachment Petition 4 of 5, #5 Attachment Petition 5 of 5, #6 Attachment Consent) (es)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (lh)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Aaron Klein. (lh)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (Filing Fee $5 Due), filed by Petitioner Aaron Klein. (Attachments: #1 Petition Part 2 of 5, #2 Petition Part 3 of 5, #3 Petition Part 4 of 5, #4 Petition Part 5 of 5) (lh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
