Shaohua Liang v. Monty Wilkinson et al
| Shaohua Liang |
| ANTONY BLINKEN, Tae D. Johnson, Troy Miller, Tracy Renaud, Acting Atty General MONTY WILKINSON, Mora Namdar, Alejandro Mayorkas and Monty Wilkinson |
| 2:2021cv01486 |
| February 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Alka Sagar |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. § 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shaohua Liang, upon Defendant Antony Blinken served on 3/2/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of delivery)(Huang, Daniel) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shaohua Liang, upon Defendant Tae D. Johnson served on 3/2/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of delivery ICE)(Huang, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shaohua Liang, upon Defendant Troy Miller served on 3/3/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of delivery CBP)(Huang, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shaohua Liang, upon Defendant Tracy Renaud served on 3/3/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of delivery USCIS)(Huang, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shaohua Liang, upon Defendant Mora Namdar served on 3/4/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of delivery Bureau of Consular Affairs)(Huang, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shaohua Liang, upon Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas served on 3/3/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of delivery DHS Counsel)(Huang, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shaohua Liang, upon Defendant Monty Wilkinson served on 2/26/2021, answer due 4/27/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of delivery US Attorney, #2 Exhibit Proof of delivery DOJ)(Huang, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 7
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 19-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:14-cv-05688 SJO(ASx). Case referred from Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar for Discovery. The case number will now read as follows: 2:21-cv-01486 FMO(ASx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (rn)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Monty Wilkinson. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by plaintiff Shaohua Liang. (Huang, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Huang, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Shaohua Liang. (Huang, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30598760 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Shaohua Liang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit US passport, #2 Exhibit Certificate of naturalization, #3 Exhibit Notice to appear, #4 Exhibit Order of immigration judge, #5 Exhibit DHS appeal receipt) (Attorney Daniel T Huang added to party Shaohua Liang(pty:pla))(Huang, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
