Humberto Diaz Cisneros v. County of Los Angeles et al
Humberto Diaz Cisneros |
Deputy Tarin, Deputy Stilgenbauer, County of Los Angeles, Deputy Barr and Does 1-30, inclusive |
2:2021cv01493 |
February 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
John E McDermott |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 1/24/22. (rfi) |
Filing 16 Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/21/2022 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 4/19/2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi) |
Filing 15 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 14 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING Parties' Stipulation to Continue The 4/5/2021 Scheduling conference #13 to 4/12/2021 at 11:00 AM. See Order for specifics. (jp) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION for Order to Continue the April 5, 2021 Scheduling Conference to Either April 12, 2021 or April 19, 2021, or Alternatively, to Allow Non-Lead Defense Counsel to Personally Appear for Scheduling Conference filed by Defendants Barr(in Official), Barr(in Individual), County of Los Angeles, Stilgenbauer(in Individual), Stilgenbauer(in Official), Tarin(in Individual), Tarin(in Official). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Beach, Paul) |
Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Paul B Beach counsel for Defendants Barr, Barr, County of Los Angeles, Stilgenbauer, Stilgenbauer, Tarin, Tarin. Emily B. Suhr is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deputy Barr, Deputy Tarin, and Deputy Stilgenbauer. (Beach, Paul) |
Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4, filed by Plaintiff Humberto Diaz Cisneros.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates)(Zaldana, Antonio) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 4/5/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Barr(in Official), Barr(in Individual), County of Los Angeles, Stilgenbauer(in Individual), Stilgenbauer(in Official), Tarin(in Individual), Tarin(in Official).(Choi, Jin) |
Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Paul B Beach counsel for Defendants Barr, Barr, County of Los Angeles, Stilgenbauer, Stilgenbauer, Tarin, Tarin. Adding Paul B. Beach as counsel of record for Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deputy Tarin, Deputy Stilgenbauer and Deputy Barr for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deputy Tarin, Deputy Stilgenbauer and Deputy Barr. (Attorney Paul B Beach added to party Barr(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B Beach added to party Barr(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B Beach added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B Beach added to party Stilgenbauer(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B Beach added to party Stilgenbauer(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B Beach added to party Tarin(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B Beach added to party Tarin(pty:dft))(Beach, Paul) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Barr(in Official), Barr(in Individual), County of Los Angeles, Does, Stilgenbauer(in Individual), Stilgenbauer(in Official), Tarin(in Individual), Tarin(in Official).ry Demanded., filed by plaintiff Humberto Diaz Cisneros. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/4/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A-7) (ghap) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jin S Choi counsel for Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deputy Barr, Deputy Stilgenbauer, Deputy Tarin. Adding Jin S. Choi as counsel of record for County of Los Angeles, Deputy Tarin, Deputy Stilgenbauer and Deputy Barr for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deputy Tarin, Deputy Stilgenbauer and Deputy Barr. (Attorney Jin S Choi added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Jin S Choi added to party Deputy Barr(pty:dft), Attorney Jin S Choi added to party Deputy Stilgenbauer(pty:dft), Attorney Jin S Choi added to party Deputy Tarin(pty:dft))(Choi, Jin) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deputy Barr, Deputy Stilgenbauer, Deputy Tarin, (Suhr, Emily) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deputy Barr, Deputy Stilgenbauer, Deputy Tarin. (Suhr, Emily) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court- Glendale Courthouse, case number 20GDCV01054 Receipt No: ACACDC-30600540 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Deputy Stilgenbauer, Deputy Tarin, County of Los Angeles, Deputy Barr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A"- Complaint, #2 Exhibit "B"- All pleadings and orders served upon Defendants) (Attorney Emily B Suhr added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Emily B Suhr added to party Deputy Barr(pty:dft), Attorney Emily B Suhr added to party Deputy Stilgenbauer(pty:dft), Attorney Emily B Suhr added to party Deputy Tarin(pty:dft))(Suhr, Emily) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.