Kenneth A. Storms v. Paychex, Inc. et al
| Kenneth A. Storms |
| PAYCHEX NORTH AMERICA INC., Paychex, Inc. and DOES 1-25, inclusive, |
| 2:2021cv01534 |
| February 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28:1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants PAYCHEX NORTH AMERICA INC., Paychex, Inc.. Related Case(s): None (McCready, Nolan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants PAYCHEX NORTH AMERICA INC., Paychex, Inc., (McCready, Nolan) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants PAYCHEX NORTH AMERICA INC., Paychex, Inc. (McCready, Nolan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants PAYCHEX NORTH AMERICA INC., Paychex, Inc.. (McCready, Nolan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV00090 Receipt No: ACACDC-30613295 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants PAYCHEX NORTH AMERICA INC., Paychex, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael A. Hood, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Answer, #4 Exhibit C - Notice to State Court, #5 Declaration of Joel Daggar, #6 Proof of Service) (Attorney Nolan Shields McCready added to party PAYCHEX NORTH AMERICA INC.(pty:dft), Attorney Nolan Shields McCready added to party Paychex, Inc.(pty:dft))(McCready, Nolan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
