Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Time Piece Collections, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant: Ali Paravar, A Luxury Watch Brand, Inc., LSM Watch, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Luxury Swiss Made Watches, Time Piece Collections, Inc. and LSM Watch, Inc. doing business as Luxury Swiss Made Watches
Case Number: 2:2021cv01612
Filed: February 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S Gutierrez
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 6/21/2021 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
April 16, 2021 Filing 25 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant All Defendants, identifying LSM Watch, Inc. d/b/a Luxury Swiss Made Watches; Time Piece Collections, Inc.; A Luxury Watch Brand, Inc.; Ali Paravar. (Attorney Matthew Lawrence Seror added to party Time Piece Collections, Inc.(pty:dft))(Seror, Matthew)
April 16, 2021 Filing 24 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant A Luxury Watch Brand, Inc., LSM Watch, Inc., Ali Paravar.(Seror, Matthew)
March 25, 2021 Filing 23 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants LSM Watch, Inc..(Attorney Matthew Lawrence Seror added to party LSM Watch, Inc.(pty:dft))(Seror, Matthew)
March 5, 2021 Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., upon Defendant Ali Paravar served on 2/25/2021, answer due 3/18/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon ALI PARAVAR in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bellinger, Matthew)
March 5, 2021 Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., upon Defendant Time Piece Collections, Inc. served on 2/25/2021, answer due 3/18/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon ALI PARAVAR - REGISTERED AGENT in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bellinger, Matthew)
March 5, 2021 Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., upon Defendant LSM Watch, Inc. served on 2/25/2021, answer due 3/18/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon ALI PARAVAR - REGISTERED AGENT in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bellinger, Matthew)
March 5, 2021 Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., upon Defendant A Luxury Watch Brand, Inc. served on 2/25/2021, answer due 3/18/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon ALI PARAVAR - REGISTERED AGENT in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bellinger, Matthew)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:02-cv-01089 PSG(VBKx). Case transferred from Judge George H. Wu to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-01612 PSG(VBKx). Signed by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez (rn)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: granting #9 Non-Resident Attorney Adam W. Sgro APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of plaintiff Rolex Watch USA Inc, designating Matthew S. Bellinger as local counsel. (mrgo)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: granting #8 Non-Resident Attorney Jeffrey E. Dupler APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of plaintiff Rolex Watch USA Inc, designating Matthew S. Bellinger as local counsel. (mrgo)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: granting #7 Non-Resident Attorney Brian W. Brokate APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of plaintiff Rolex Watch USA Inc, designating Matthew S. Bellinger as local counsel. (mrgo)
February 24, 2021 Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants A Luxury Watch Brand, Inc., LSM Watch, Inc., Ali Paravar, Time Piece Collections, Inc. (jtil)
February 24, 2021 Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants A Luxury Watch Brand, Inc., LSM Watch, Inc., Ali Paravar and Time Piece Collections, Inc. (jtil)
February 24, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
February 24, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil)
February 22, 2021 Filing 9 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Adam W. Sgro to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-30636831) filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bellinger, Matthew)
February 22, 2021 Filing 8 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeffrey E. Dupler to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-30636784) filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bellinger, Matthew)
February 22, 2021 Filing 7 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brian W. Brokate to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-30636735) filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bellinger, Matthew)
February 22, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. Related Case(s): 2-cv-01089-GAF-VBKx (Bellinger, Matthew)
February 22, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., (Bellinger, Matthew)
February 22, 2021 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Bellinger, Matthew)
February 22, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Bellinger, Matthew)
February 22, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Bellinger, Matthew)
February 22, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30636436 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10) (Attorney Matthew Scott Bellinger added to party Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.(pty:pla))(Bellinger, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Time Piece Collections, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ali Paravar
Represented By: Willmore F Holbrow, III
Represented By: Matthew Lawrence Seror
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A Luxury Watch Brand, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Lawrence Seror
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LSM Watch, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Luxury Swiss Made Watches
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Piece Collections, Inc.
Represented By: Willmore F Holbrow, III
Represented By: Matthew Lawrence Seror
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LSM Watch, Inc. doing business as Luxury Swiss Made Watches
Represented By: Willmore F Holbrow, III
Represented By: Matthew Lawrence Seror
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Scott Bellinger
Represented By: Jeffrey E Dupler
Represented By: Adam W Sgro
Represented By: Craig S Summers
Represented By: Brian W Brokate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?