Brian Donahoe v. Harvard Collection Services Inc et al
Brian Donahoe |
Harvard Collection Services Inc, Harvard Collection Services LLC and Does 1-10 |
2:2021cv01613 |
February 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E McDermott |
Mark C Scarsi |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Harvard Collection Services Inc, Harvard Collection Services LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Donahoe. (Ridley, Eric) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Donahoe, (Ridley, Eric) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Brian Donahoe. (Ridley, Eric) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30636668 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Brian Donahoe. (Attorney Eric D Ridley added to party Brian Donahoe(pty:pla))(Ridley, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.