Dulce Limian Pineda v. Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. et al
Dulce Lilian Pineda |
DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive and Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. |
2:2021cv01633 |
February 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
Mark C Scarsi |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than January 24, 2022. (smo) |
Filing 11 ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/28/2022 at 2:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 3/15/2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. See document for additional pretrial dates and deadlines. (smo) |
Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the parties' Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report with respect to the Scheduling Conference and has concluded that the hearing on April 12, 2021 is not necessary. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is taken off calendar and under submission. No appearance by counsel is necessary. A separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for this case. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo) |
Filing 9 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Defendant Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc... (Atherton, Emily) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 4/12/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) |
Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/19/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2)(ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc., Does 1 to 100, Inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Dulce Lilian Pineda. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/21/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc... (Atherton, Emily) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc.. (Atherton, Emily) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc., identifying Defendant Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc., erroneously sued and served as Buffalo Wild Wings, a party to this action, may have a pecuniary interest in the outcome of this case. Defendant is a subsidiary of IRB Holding Corp., which is a subsidiary of ARG IH LLC, which is a subsidiary of Mavericks, Inc., which is a subsidiary of Inspire Brands, Inc. No publicly held company owns 10% or more of Defendant's stock. (Atherton, Emily) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV48646 Receipt No: ACACDC-30641415 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Answer to Complaint) (Attorney Emily Julia Atherton added to party Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc.(pty:dft))(Atherton, Emily) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.