Gabriela Cabrera v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
| Gabriela Cabrera |
| GABRIELA CABRERA, an individual, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Exxon Mobil Corporation, a New Jersey corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation |
| 2:2021cv01732 |
| February 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION (JS-6) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. re: Notice of Settlement #16 . (smo)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Gabriela Cabrera. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Exxon Mobil Corporation answer now due 4/22/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation.(Attorney Amber L Roller added to party Exxon Mobil Corporation(pty:dft))(Roller, Amber) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Gabriela Cabrera, upon Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation served on 3/2/2021, answer due 3/23/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. The Court has reviewed the Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Gabriela Cabrerato Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive-form only-no proceeding held #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Cabrera)(Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation. (jtil) |
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/12/2021. (smo)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order re Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans with Disabilities Act by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff GABRIELA CABRERA, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant GABRIELA CABRERA, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff GABRIELA CABRERA, an individual, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30696253 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff GABRIELA CABRERA, an individual. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party GABRIELA CABRERA, an individual(pty:dft))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
