Miguel Hernandez v. FAF Investment Company et al
| MIGUEL HERNANDEZ |
| HOMEGOODS, INC., FAF INVESTMENT COMPANY, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, FAF Investment Company and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2021cv01745 |
| February 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Steve Kim |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (jre) |
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (jre)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants FAF Investment Company, Homegoods, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 MIGUEL HERNANDEZ. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MIGUEL HERNANDEZ. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30699618 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party MIGUEL HERNANDEZ(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
