Jordan Rosenblatt v. Broadway Financial Corporation et al
| Jordan Rosenblatt |
| Daniel A. Medina, Jack T. Thompson, Erin Selleck, Robert C. Davidson, Jr.,, Virgil Roberts, Wayne-Kent A. Bradshaw, Dutch C. Ross III and Broadway Financial Corporation |
| 2:2021cv01790 |
| February 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (et) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jordan Rosenblatt, identifying Broadway Financial Corporation, Virgil Roberts, Daniel A. Medina, Wayne-Kent A. Bradshaw, Erin Selleck, Robert C. Davidson, Jr., Dutch C. Ross III, and Jack T. Thompson. (Elkins, Joel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jordan Rosenblatt. (Elkins, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30724211 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Jordan Rosenblatt. (Attorney Joel E Elkins added to party Jordan Rosenblatt(pty:pla))(Elkins, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
