Jason Alan v. Tesla Motors Inc. et al
| Jason Alan and Jason L Alan |
| Does 1-10 inclusive and Tesla Motors Inc. |
| 2:2021cv01800 |
| February 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Otis D Wright |
| Other Fraud |
| 15 U.S.C. § 2301 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER REGARDING PARTIES STIPULATION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT #18 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : The default entered by the Clerk is hereby SET ASIDE #12 . (lc) Modified on 4/15/2021 (lc).
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION to Set Aside Default as to Defendant filed by Defendant Tesla Motors Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #13 , for the following reasons: (1) Defendant failed to comply with Local Rule 7-3. (2) Default has been entered against Defendant. See Warner Bros. Home Entmt, Inc. v. Meyers, 13-cv-00890-SJO (VBKx), 2013 WL 12142605, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2013); (lc)
|
|
Filing 16
SELF REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, I, (lc)
|
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerks Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 14 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #13 filed by Defendant Tesla Motors Inc.. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 13 STRICKEN PER 4/12/2021 ORDER, DOCKET NO. 17). NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Tesla Motors Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 5/17/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Soheyl Tahsildoost in support, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Soheyl Tahsildoost, #3 Declaration Declaration of Raymond Kim, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Raymond Kim, #5 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Tesla Motors Inc.(pty:dft)) (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) Modified on 4/12/2021 (lc). |
| Filing 12 (SET ASIDE PER 4/15/2021 ORDER, DOCKET NO. 19).DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Tesla Motors Inc. (lc) Modified on 4/15/2021 (lc). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document, #10 Pro Se Plaintiff's Request for default by clerk. The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: REQUEST: CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT. Please Use ONLY the Correct cited event in future filings. Because the Pro Se is permitted to e-file and this is his first attempt. 1) Please be advised to use correct docketing events in the future. Use the systems "Search" option for correct events, Miscellaneous Document event is only when no event exists, which is not the case in this matter. 2)The Clerk will process filer's request for default by separate entry on official form, the proposed order is not applicable. Therefore NO Response to this notice is required. (lc) |
| Filing 10 PLAINTIFF JASON ALANS REQUEST ) FOR ENTRY OF CLERKS DEFAULT ) JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT ) TESLA MOTORS INC aka TESLA ) PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P 55 filed by Plaintiff Jason L Alan (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Orde, #2 Exhibits)(Alan, Jason) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jason L Alan, upon Defendant Tesla Motors Inc. served on 3/17/2021, answer due 4/7/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were personally executed upon Daisy Montenegro, agent for service, CT Corporation in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.(lc) |
| Filing 8 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: granting #3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (lc) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Tesla Motors Inc. (hr) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (lh) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Jason Alan. (lh) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Jason Alan. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Tesla Motors Inc. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Jason Alan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
