David Benitez v. Social Security Administration
| David Benitez |
| Social Security Administration |
| 2:2021cv01904 |
| March 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mail Returned addressed to David Benitez re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-25) #3 (hr) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Paul H Sachelari added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft))(Sachelari, Paul) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Social Security Administration, OF NOTICE TO STATE COURT AND ADVERSE PARTIES OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AS IT PERTAINS TO FEDERAL DEFENDANT SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION served on 3/3/2021. (Kim, Cedina) |
Filing 4
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (SOCIAL SECURITY) by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (kh)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed against Defendant Social Security Administration, filed by plaintiff David Benitez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/8/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff David Benitez, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Social Security Administration, 160 Spear Street, Suite 800, San Francisco, CA 94105 in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Social Security Administration. (Kim, Cedina) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 20STLC10216 No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Defendant Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Superior Court Complaint, #2 Proof of Service) (Attorney Cedina M Kim added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft))(Kim, Cedina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: David Benitez v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Benitez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Cedina M Kim |
| Represented By: | Paul H. Sachelari |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
