Wayne Weatherspoon v. Junho Hwang et al
| Wayne Weatherspoon |
| DOES 1-10 and Junho Hwang |
| 2:2021cv01982 |
| March 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH CLAIM by Judge R. Gary Klausner. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. The Court therefore dismisses that claim without prejudice. (lom)
|
| Filing 16 STATEMENT of Case filed by Plaintiff Wayne Weatherspoon re: Order on Application to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-22) #14 . (Steven, Laura) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties request that the ADR Program assign a Panel Mediator from the following area of law: ADA Access Litigation. Filed by Plaintiff Wayne Weatherspoon(Steven, Laura) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner: GRANTING #12 APPLICATION to Stay Case 75 days re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to Junho Hwang. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 6/8/2021. (lc)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Wayne Weatherspoonto Order to Show Cause #11 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Peter Shahriari, #2 Declaration of Wayne Weatherspoon)(Steven, Laura) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by defendant Junho Hwang. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Jong Yun Kim added to party Junho Hwang(pty:dft)) (Kim, Jong) |
|
Filing 11
(IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than 4/7/2021. (See Civil Minutes for Further Specifics). (jp)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Wayne Weatherspoon, upon Defendant Junho Hwang served on 3/14/2021, answer due 4/5/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon JUNHO HWANG, an individual in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Steven, Laura) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (gga) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (gga)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Junho Hwang. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Wayne Weatherspoon, (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Wayne Weatherspoon. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Wayne Weatherspoon. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30835942 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Wayne Weatherspoon. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party Wayne Weatherspoon(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
