Shay Brodsky v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Plaintiff: Shay Brodsky
Defendant: Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Case Number: 2:2021cv02005
Filed: March 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Referring Judge: R Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE #20 by Judge R. Gary Klausner that the Joint Stipulation is GRANTED. The above-entitled matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
June 16, 2021 Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Re Dismissal With Prejudice)(Cummings, Andrew)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. The Court has reviewed the Notice of Settlement #18 filed on June 14, 2021. The parties are hereby notified that they are not relieved of any deadlines (including the filing of responsive documents, scheduled mediation, etc.) or Court appearances until a dismissal of the action is filed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
June 14, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. (Cummings, Andrew)
March 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/21/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 6/28/2021 at 9:00 am. (sw)
March 19, 2021 Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation.(Cummings, Andrew)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Defendant's Notice of Errata [DE #14 ) by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Defendant misinterprets the Standing Order. The Standing Order does require parties using form pleadings in removed actions to file new pleadings that comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Rules") within 30 days of removal. (Standing Order at 2, ECF No. #8 ). But the Standing Order does not displace Rule 81. Rule 81 requires defendants in removed actions to answer, if they have not already done so, within the longest of these periods: (A) 21 days after receiving-through service or otherwise-a copy of the initial pleading stating the claim for relief; (B) 21 days after being served with the summons for an initial pleading on file at the time of service; or (C) 7 days after the notice of removal is filed. Defendant must therefore answer by March 18, 2021 because that is 21 days from when it was first served - the longest of the other time periods. If it fails to do so, Defendant will be in danger of being in default. Plaintiff, though, must also comply with the Standing Order by filing a corrected pleading that conforms with "Rules 7, 7.1, 8, 9, 10, and 11." (Standing Order at 2). If Plaintiff fails to do so by April 4, 2021, the Court may dismiss the case for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with the Court's requirements. See minute order for details. (lom) Modified on 3/19/2021 (lom).
March 15, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. correcting NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 4/8/2021 #10 REVISED (Cummings, Andrew)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Notice of Errata #12 , for the following reasons: Document contains single-spaced text. LR 11-3.6 (jp)
March 12, 2021 Filing 12 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 3/15/2021, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #13 ] - NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. correcting NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 4/8/2021 #10 (Cummings, Andrew). Modified on 3/15/2021 (jp).
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 4/8/2021 #10 , for the following reasons: (1) Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment; (2) See L.R. 7-20. (jp)
March 11, 2021 Filing 10 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 3/12/2021, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #11 ] - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 4/8/2021 filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. (Cummings, Andrew). Modified on 3/12/2021 (jp).
March 10, 2021 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #8 served on 03/10/2021. (Cummings, Andrew)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
March 5, 2021 Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Andrew Michael Cummings counsel for Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. Adding Andrew M. Cummings as counsel of record for Toyota Motor Credit Corporation for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. (Attorney Andrew Michael Cummings added to party Toyota Motor Credit Corporation(pty:dft))(Cummings, Andrew)
March 5, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
March 5, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap)
March 4, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF SMALL CLAIMS COURT against Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation., filed by plaintiff Shay Brodsky. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
March 4, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Danielle Michelle Mayer on behalf of Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (Mayer, Danielle)
March 4, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Mayer, Danielle)
March 4, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. (Mayer, Danielle)
March 4, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20PDSC2407 Receipt No: ACACDC-30856535 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Danielle Michelle Mayer added to party Toyota Motor Credit Corporation(pty:dft))(Mayer, Danielle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shay Brodsky v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Represented By: Danielle Michelle Mayer
Represented By: Andrew Michael Cummings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shay Brodsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?