Canon Inc. v. Digital Marketing Corporation
| Canon Inc. |
| Digital Marketing Corporation |
| 2:2021cv02094 |
| March 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction) (gk) |
| Filing 17 JOINT STIPULATION, CONSENT JUDGMENT, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation #16 , IT IS ORDERED, AND ADJUDGED that Judgement is entered for Plaintiff and against Defendant on the claims asserted in Plaintiff's complaint. Defendant and its subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, successors, and assigns, and all other persons and organizations in active concert or participation with any of the foregoing, are hereby permanently enjoined and restrained re Asserted Patents, Named Products, any other toner supply container that has a pump or track as depicted in the Appendices, etc. Defendant and Plaintiff shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. This Consent Judgment constitutes a final judgment concerning the subject matter of this action. Upon entry of this Consent Judgment, this action is dismissed, with prejudice; provided, however, that this Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms and provisions of this Consent Judgment. See document for further details. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (gk) |
| Filing 16 Joint STIPULATION for Judgment as to Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction filed by Plaintiff Canon Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brooks, Sarah) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Digital Marketing Corporation answer now due 5/6/2021, filed by Defendant Digital Marketing Corporation.(Dang, Sang) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Digital Marketing Corporation, (Dang, Sang) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Sang N Dang on behalf of Defendant Digital Marketing Corporation (Attorney Sang N Dang added to party Digital Marketing Corporation(pty:dft))(Dang, Sang) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by Plaintiff Canon Inc.. (Brooks, Sarah) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Canon Inc., upon Defendant Digital Marketing Corporation served on 3/16/2021, answer due 4/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Donnette Applewhite, a Registered Agent, Inc., Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Brooks, Sarah) |
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Digital Marketing Corporation. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Canon Inc.. (Brooks, Sarah) |
| Filing 4 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Canon Inc., (Brooks, Sarah) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Canon Inc.. (Brooks, Sarah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Canon Inc.. (Brooks, Sarah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30876963 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Canon Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-13) (Attorney Sarah S. Brooks added to party Canon Inc.(pty:pla))(Brooks, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Canon Inc. v. Digital Marketing Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Digital Marketing Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Sang N Dang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Canon Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Sarah S. Brooks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
