City of Manhattan Beach v. General Reinsurance Corporation et al
City of Manhattan Beach |
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive and General Reinsurance Corporation |
2:2021cv02210 |
March 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
Mark C Scarsi |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) City of Manhattan Beach.(Haverkamp, Albert) |
Filing 30 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS ORDER DISMISSING ACTION (JS-6) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. re: Notice of Settlement #29 . (smo) |
Filing 29 NOTICE of Settlement JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT filed by Defendant, Counterclaimant General Reinsurance Corporation. (Barbanel, Alan) |
Filing 28 ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND OTHER CASE DATES #27 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (lc) |
Filing 27 STIPULATION to Continue Trial dates and other case dates from August 2, 2022 @ 8:30 AM to October 2, 2022 @ 8:30 AM filed by Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant City of Manhattan Beach. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF ALBERT E. HA VERKAMP IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND OTHER CASE DATES, #2 Proposed Order ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND OTHER CASE DATES)(Haverkamp, Albert) |
Filing 26 STATUS REPORT on Results of Mediation filed by Counter Defendant City of Manhattan Beach, Plaintiff City of Manhattan Beach. (Haverkamp, Albert) |
Filing 25 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero re Stipulation for Protective Order #24 . [See document for details.] (es) |
Filing 24 Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant, Counterclaimant General Reinsurance Corporation.(Barbanel, Alan) |
Filing 23 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION #22 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi:1) that the mediation is to be completed on or before November 30, 2021; and 2) that the Parties are required to report the results of the mediation to the Court within seven (7) days after November 30, 2021. (lc) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION to Continue Deadline to Complete Mediation from October 29, 2021 to November 30, 2021 filed by Defendant, Counterclaimant General Reinsurance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Barbanel, Alan) |
Filing 21 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than October 29, 2021. (smo) |
Filing 20 ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/18/2022 at 2:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 8/2/2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. See document for additional pretrial dates and deadlines. (smo) |
Filing 19 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Mr. Haverkamp, counsel for plaintiff appears by telephone. Recording or rebroadcasting of the proceedings is strictly prohibited. The Court confers with counsel regarding the status of the case. The Court has reviewed the parties' May 29, 2021 Joint Report and is inclined to set a trial date of August 2, 2022. A separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for thiscase. Court Reporter: Anne Kielwasser. (lc) |
Filing 18 ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #16 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Albert E. Haverkamp's request to appear by telephone for the June 14, 2021 Scheduling Conference is hereby GRANTED.It is expected that all future hearings will be in person and, as such, Counsel should plan on appearing in person for future hearings. (lc) |
Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: REQUEST for Leave of Albert E. Haverkamp to Appear for Telephonically at Scheduling Conference and Proposed Order #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Filing is a Combined Request and Order in one pdf document. This format is not applicable in e-filing which requires proposed orders be formally and separately prepared and to be attached as a Separate Attachment to a main document. Filer scheduled an erroneous duplicate 6/14/21 10:00 AM hearing on Judge's calendar. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 16 REQUEST for Leave of Albert E. Haverkamp to Appear for Telephonically at Scheduling Conference and Proposed Order filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant City of Manhattan Beach. Request set for hearing on 6/14/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Haverkamp, Albert) |
Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10-15, filed by Counter Defendant City of Manhattan Beach, Plaintiff City of Manhattan Beach.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet)(Haverkamp, Albert) |
Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10-15, filed by Counter Defendant City of Manhattan Beach, Plaintiff City of Manhattan Beach.. (Haverkamp, Albert) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim #10 filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant City of Manhattan Beach.(Haverkamp, Albert) |
Filing 12 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Counter Claimant General Reinsurance Corporation, Defendant General Reinsurance Corporation. as to Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim #10 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Answer and Counterclaim)(Barbanel, Alan) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 6/14/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) and, COUNTERCLAIM against City of Manhattan Beach filed by Defendant, Counterclaimant General Reinsurance Corporation.(Barbanel, Alan) |
Filing 9 ORDER RE STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION TO APRIL 2, 2021 #8 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi (lc) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to General Reinsurance Corporation answer now due 4/2/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant General Reinsurance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Barbanel, Alan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Initial Standing Order filed by Defendant General Reinsurance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI)(Barbanel, Alan) |
Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (dd) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, General Reinsurance Corporation, filed by Plaintiff City of Manhattan Beach. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 2/2/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant General Reinsurance Corporation, identifying General Reinsurance Corporation; General Re Corporation; Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.. (Barbanel, Alan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant General Reinsurance Corporation. (Barbanel, Alan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California, case number 21TRCV00074 with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 03/11/2021, receipt number 30898346), filed by Defendant General Reinsurance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Service of Process Transmittal) (Attorney Alan H Barbanel added to party General Reinsurance Corporation(pty:dft))(Barbanel, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.