Margaret Hicks v. Vivint Solar, Inc. et al
| Margaret Hicks |
| Vivint Solar Developer, LLC, Vivint Solar, Inc., DOES 1 through 20 and DOES 1 through 20 inclusive |
| 2:2021cv02232 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| George H Wu |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 MINUTES OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge George H. Wu. Court and counsel confer. For reasons stated on the record, the scheduling conference is continued to May 20, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are to file a joint status report by noon on May 17, 2021. Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action #14 , set for hearing on May 24, 2021, is taken off-calendar to be reset on May 20. Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (mrgo) |
| Filing 24 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - IN CHAMBERS: by Judge George H. Wu: Counsel are to appear telephonically for Thursday's 05/06/2021 scheduling conference at 8:30 a.m. by contacting the court clerk at javier_gonzalez@cacd.uscourts.gov for dial-in information. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 23 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #14 filed by Plaintiff Margaret Hicks. (Wilcox, Ronald) |
| Filing 22 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants DOES, Vivint Solar Developer, LLC, Vivint Solar, Inc. amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Margaret Hicks (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wilcox, Ronald) |
Filing 21
ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: granting #20 Non-Resident Attorney Andrew Milz APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of plaintiff Margaret Hicks, designating Ivan Lopez-Ventura as local counsel. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 20 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew Milz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Margaret Hicks (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 4/14/2021, Receipt No. ACACDC-31115410) filed by Plaintiff Margaret Hicks. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Lopez-Ventura, Ivan) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Ivan Miguel Lopez-Ventura counsel for Plaintiff Margaret Hicks. Adding Ivan M Lopez Ventura as counsel of record for Margaret Hicks for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Margaret Hicks. (Attorney Ivan Miguel Lopez-Ventura added to party Margaret Hicks(pty:pla))(Lopez-Ventura, Ivan) |
| Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff Margaret Hicks.. (Wilcox, Ronald) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: REQUEST of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew Milz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Margaret Hicks (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31115410) #15 by Judge George H. Wu. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by Docket No. 15 is stricken for the reason(s) stated in the Notice #16 filed on April 15, 2021. (lc) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: REQUEST of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew Milz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Margaret Hicks (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31115410) #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event is Appear Pro Hac Vice (G-64) Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. Other error(s) with document(s): Document uploaded out of sequence. Proposed order should be submitted as an attachment to the Application, not as first page. Document is an Application and not a Request. Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests.. Application.. Appear Pro Hac Vice. Note: Wrong event does not provide relief or changes sought. (lt) |
| Filing 15 (STRICKEN PER 4/19/2021 COURT'S G11B RESPONSE, DOCKET NO. 17). REQUEST of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew Milz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Margaret Hicks (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31115410) filed by Plaintiff Margaret Hicks. (Wilcox, Ronald) Modified on 4/19/2021 (lc). |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendants Vivint Solar Developer, LLC, Vivint Solar, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 5/24/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Nikdel, Susan) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Vivint Solar Developer, LLC, Vivint Solar, Inc., re Order #10 , Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings #11 served on April 6, 2021. (Nikdel, Susan) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge George H. Wu re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #8 . Defendants shall have until April 9, 2021 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. (Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/22/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 5/6/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-02232 GW(JCx). (rn)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Vivint Solar Developer, LLC answer now due 4/9/2021; Vivint Solar, Inc. answer now due 4/9/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants Vivint Solar Developer, LLC; Vivint Solar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nikdel, Susan) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Vivint Solar Developer, LLC, Vivint Solar, Inc., re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 served on March 16, 2021. (Nikdel, Susan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Margaret Hicks in Los Angeles Superior Court on 2/22/2021, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Vivint Solar Developer, LLC, Vivint Solar, Inc., identifying Sunrun Inc.. (Nikdel, Susan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Vivint Solar Developer, LLC, Vivint Solar, Inc.. (Nikdel, Susan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21AVCV00034 Receipt No: ACACDC-30903708 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Vivint Solar Developer, LLC, Vivint Solar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Susan Nona Nikdel added to party Vivint Solar Developer, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Susan Nona Nikdel added to party Vivint Solar, Inc.(pty:dft))(Nikdel, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
