Krystal Fernandez et al v. Capital One, N.A.
Brett Becker and Krystal Fernandez |
Capital One, N.A. doing business as Capital One Auto Finance |
2:2021cv02253 |
March 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
James V Selna |
Michael R Wilner |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER ON PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT, #18 by Judge James V. Selna, the Court ORDERS that Capital One's deadline to respond to the initial Complaint is hereby extended sixty (60) days, up to and including June 8, 2021. (es) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to June 8, 2021 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant, Capital One N.A. Capital One, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Alicia A Baiardo added to party Capital One, N.A.(pty:dft))(Baiardo, Alicia) |
Filing 17 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 6/14/2021 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 6/7/2021. (lb) |
Filing 16 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, Granting #13 Non-Resident Attorney Franklin D. Azar APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff(s) Krystal Fernandez and Brett Becker, designating Jason M. Frank as local counsel. (es) |
Filing 15 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
Filing 14 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:18-cv-00332 JVS(MRWx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero and Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-02253 JVS(MRWx). Signed by Judge James V. Selna (rn) |
Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Franklin D. Azar to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Brett Becker, Krystal Fernandez (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-30936528) filed by Plaintiffs Brett Becker, Krystal Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Frank, Jason) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance, #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Scott Howard Sims on behalf of Plaintiffs Brett Becker, Krystal Fernandez (Attorney Scott Howard Sims added to party Brett Becker(pty:pla), Attorney Scott Howard Sims added to party Krystal Fernandez(pty:pla))(Sims, Scott) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Franklin D Azar on behalf on Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Capital One, N.A. (ghap) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Andrew D. Stolper on behalf of Plaintiffs Brett Becker, Krystal Fernandez (Attorney Andrew D. Stolper added to party Brett Becker(pty:pla), Attorney Andrew D. Stolper added to party Krystal Fernandez(pty:pla))(Stolper, Andrew) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice of Related Case(s) #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by Plaintiffs Brett Becker, Krystal Fernandez. (Frank, Jason) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiffs Brett Becker, Krystal Fernandez. Related Case(s): 8:18-cv-00332-JVS (MRWx) and 2:20-cv-10518-JVS (MRW) (Frank, Jason) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Brett Becker, Krystal Fernandez, identifying Capital One, N.A., d/b/a Capital One Auto Finance. (Frank, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Brett Becker, Krystal Fernandez. (Frank, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30909724 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Krystal Fernandez, Brett Becker. (Attorney Jason M. Frank added to party Brett Becker(pty:pla), Attorney Jason M. Frank added to party Krystal Fernandez(pty:pla))(Frank, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.