James Shayler v. Queeny Yeghiaian et al
James Shayler |
Does 1-10, inclusive, Berge Yeghiaian and Queeny Yeghiaian |
2:2021cv02363 |
March 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L Abrams |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Shaylerto Order to Show Cause #16 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Shayler)(Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/12/2021. (vv) |
Filing 15 STANDING ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (vv) |
Filing 14 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, filed by defendant Queeny Yeghiaian.(Attorney Phach T Ngo added to party Queeny Yeghiaian(pty:dft))(Ngo, Phach) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Berge Yeghiaian(as trustee of the BERGE YEGHIAIAN AND QUEENY YEGHIAIAN TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 2, 1994 ) served on 4/9/2021, answer due 4/30/2021; Berge Yeghiaian(individually) served on 4/9/2021, answer due 4/30/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Queeny Yeghiaian served on 3/31/2021, answer due 4/21/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (vv) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Berge Yeghiaian(as trustee of the BERGE YEGHIAIAN AND QUEENY YEGHIAIAN TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 2, 1994 ), Berge Yeghiaian(individually). (ghap) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Queeny Yeghiaian. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (ghap) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30936946 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.