James Shayler v. Jack In The Box #213, et al
| James Shayler |
| Does 1-10, inclusive, Jack In The Box #213, Edward R. Baker and Marsha R. Baker |
| 2:2021cv02398 |
| March 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge George H. Wu re: Notice of Settlement #15 . (Dismissal papers due by 6/22/2021. Show Cause Hearing set for 6/24/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Edward R. Baker served on 4/8/2021, answer due 4/29/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Plaintiff Jack In The Box #213 served on 4/8/2021, answer due 4/29/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Marsha R. Baker served on 4/6/2021, answer due 4/27/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-02398 GW(Ex). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Edward R. Baker, Marsha R. Baker. (esa) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Jack In The Box #213. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30941937 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
