Stephen Montes v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
| Stephen Montes |
| Golden State Supply LLC, Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Does 2 through 50, inclusive and Doe |
| 2:2021cv02495 |
| March 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference 06/28/21 at 11:00 AM. (pg)
|
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Golden State Supply LLC, (Carter, James) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Golden State Supply LLC. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT E TO DECLARATION of James P. Carter #3 ]. (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT #1 Upon filing the complaint in this case, plaintiff(s) being ignorant of the true name of a defendant, designate such defendant in the complaint by the fictitious name of DOE 1, having discovery the defendant's true name to be GOLDEN STATE SUPPLY LLC, filed by Plaintiff Stephen Montes. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/2/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO DECLARATION of James P. Carter #3 ].(et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Does 2 through 50, inclusive, Golden State Supply LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Stephen Montes. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/1/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO DECLARATION of James P. Carter #3 ]. (et) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Golden State Supply LLC, identifying Plaintiff Stephen Montes; Defendant Advance Auto Parts, Inc.; Defendant Golden State Supply, LLC; General Parts, Inc.; General Parts International, Inc.; Advance Stores Company, Incorporated. (Carter, James) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Golden State Supply LLC identifying Advance Auto Parts, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Carter, James) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Amanda Keister re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 in Support filed by Defendants Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Golden State Supply LLC. (Carter, James) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of James P. Carter re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 in Support filed by Defendants Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Golden State Supply LLC. (Carter, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Golden State Supply LLC. (Carter, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Ventura, case number 56-2020-00545794-CU-OE-VTA Receipt No: ACACDC-30961490 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Golden State Supply LLC, Advance Auto Parts, Inc.. (Attorney James Putman Carter added to party Advance Auto Parts, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney James Putman Carter added to party Golden State Supply LLC(pty:dft))(Carter, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
