James Huntsman v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. et al
| James Huntsman |
| Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv02504 |
| March 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, (Richmond, Rick) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #10 by Clerk of Court. Counsel are directed to file their Notice of Interested Parties within 7 days of today's date. (mrgo) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (mrgo) |
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Status Conference set for 6/28/2021 03:00 PM. See order for complete details. (jre)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Rick Lloyd Richmond added to party Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints(pty:dft))(Richmond, Rick) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff James Huntsman, upon Defendant Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 4/14/2021, answer due 5/5/2021. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Rick Richmond, Esq., Attorneys for Defendant. (Jonelis, David) |
|
Filing 8
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Huntsman. (Jonelis, David) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Huntsman. (Jonelis, David) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff James Huntsman, (Jonelis, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30963334 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff James Huntsman. (Attorney David Binder Jonelis added to party James Huntsman(pty:pla))(Jonelis, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
