Erika C. Rey v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Erika C. Rey
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2021cv02509
Filed: March 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information: for attorney Jessica Elizabeth Warren counsel for Plaintiff Erika C. Rey. Changing NAME to JESSICA WARREN. Filed by Plaintiff Erika C. Rey. (Warren, Jessica)
April 12, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV21-2509 E on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
April 9, 2021 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Erika C. Rey, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 3/29/2021, answer due 5/28/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to FLABIA DE LA ROSA. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to CLERK. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to CIVIL PROCESS CLERK. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (Williams-Bronner, Jessica)
April 9, 2021 Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by PLAINTIFF Erika C. Rey. (Williams-Bronner, Jessica)
April 5, 2021 Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Margaret Branick-Abilla added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Branick-Abilla, Margaret)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Plaintiff shall promptly serve the Summons and Complaint on defendant and shall file a proof of such service within 30 days of the date of this Order. IT IS ORDERED that defendant's time to plead to the complaint is extended such that defendant's pleading must be filed within 90 days of service of the complaint. Defendant shall file a transcript of the administrative proceedings at the same time that defendant pleads to the complaint. A paper copy of the transcript of the administrative proceedings must be submitted directly to chambers within 24 hours of the time defendant pleads to the complaint. Within 30 days of the filing of defendant's answer, the plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment or remand. Within 30 days of the filing of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or remand, defendant shall file a motion for summary judgment or remand. If either party believes that the case cannot be resolved by motion, such party shall so advise the Court and the opposing party in writing. The Court will take the motions under submission without oral argument, unless the Court otherwise orders. (See document for further details) (vmun)
March 24, 2021 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (vmun)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. #5 IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED. (vmun)
March 23, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh)
March 23, 2021 Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by PLAINTIFF ERIKA C. REY. (Williams-Bronner, Jessica)
March 23, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF ERIKA C. REY, (Williams-Bronner, Jessica)
March 23, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by PLAINTIFF ERIKA C. REY. (Williams-Bronner, Jessica)
March 23, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ERIKA C. REY. (Williams-Bronner, Jessica)
March 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by PLAINTIFF ERIKA C. REY. (Attorney Jessica Elizabeth Williams-Bronner added to party ERIKA C. REY(pty:pla))(Williams-Bronner, Jessica)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erika C. Rey v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Margaret Branick-Abilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erika C. Rey
Represented By: Jessica Elizabeth Williams-Bronner
Represented By: Jessica Elizabeth Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?