James Shayler v. B-K La Canada Property, LLC et al
JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, and James Shayler |
B-K LA CANADA PROPERTY, LLC, a California limited liability company, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Does 1-10, inclusive and B-K La Canada Property, LLC |
2:2021cv02531 |
March 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Ronald SW Lew |
Karen L Stevenson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE #19 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court hereby enters a dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-entitled action, in its entirety. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys' fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) |
Filing 19 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Joint Stipulation filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 18 ORDER re: Supplemental Jurisdiction Over Plaintiffs Unruh Act Claim by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and hereby DISMISSES Plaintiffs Unruh Act claim. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb) |
Filing 17 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant B-K La Canada Property, LLC, identifying None. (Link, James) |
Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #13 filed by Defendant B-K La Canada Property, LLC.(Link, James) |
Filing 14 SCHEDULING NOTICE (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. On 5/18/2021, plaintiff filed a FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #13 as a matter of course under Rule 15(a). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B) ("A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within... 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b)...."). In light of the foregoing, Defendant NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant To FRCP, Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) #12 , filed on 5/10/2021, is DENIED without prejudice as moot. The 6/8/2021 hearing on that motion is VACATED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 13 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant B-K La Canada Property, LLC amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff James Shayler(Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant To FRCP, Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) filed by Defendant B-K La Canada Property, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 6/8/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motion To Dismiss For Lack Of Jurisdiction Pursuant To FRCP Rule 12(b)(1) and (6), #2 Declaration Of James S. Link In Support Of Motion To Dismiss For Lack Of Jurisdiction Pursuant To FRCP, Rule 12(b)(1) and (6), #3 Exhibit 1, Declaration of Shayler in Shayler v. Patel, #4 Exhibit 2, Google Map, #5 Exhibit 3, Shayler Case List) (Attorney James S Link added to party B-K La Canada Property, LLC(pty:dft)) (Link, James) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant B-K La Canada Property, LLC served on 4/19/2021, answer due 5/10/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Shaylerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Order to Show Cause, #8 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Shayler)(Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (shb) |
Filing 8 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EXERCISE OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION RE STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than April 6, 2021. See order for further details. (shb) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant B-K La Canada Property, LLC. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30975845 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.