Gennady Dolzhenko et al v. Patti McKay
| Gennady Dolzhenko and Zina Dolzhenko |
| Alex Ricciardulli, Patti McKay, Tony Richardson and Sanjay Kumar |
| 2:2021cv02591 |
| March 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #9 filed by Gennady Dolzhenko, Zina Dolzhenko. CCA # 21-55505. A review of this court's docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [See document for details.] (es)
|
| Filing 12 FILING FEE LETTER issued as to Plaintiffs Gennady Dolzhenko, Zina Dolzhenko, re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #9 . (mat) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: denying #7 MOTION for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis; denying #8 MOTION for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. (mat)
|
| Filing 10 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 21-55505 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #9 as to plaintiffs Gennady Dolzhenko, Zina Dolzhenko. (mat) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by plaintiffs Gennady Dolzhenko, Zina Dolzhenko. Appeal of Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), #6 Filed On: 4/12/21; Entered On: 4/13/21; In forma pauperis pending for both plaintiffs, see items 7 and 8. (mat) |
| Filing 8 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed by plaintiff Zina Dolzhenko. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Order on Motion for IFP) (mat) |
| Filing 7 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed by plaintiff Gennady Dolzhenko. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Order on Motion for IFP) (mat) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Denying #3 , #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. Reasons: District Court lacks jurisdiction. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6, Case Terminated. ) (gk)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Gennady Dolzhenko. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Zina Dolzhenko. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Gennady Dolzhenko and Zina Dolzhenko. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiffs Zina Dolzhenko and Gennady Dolzhenko against All Defendants. Case assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (Attachments: #1 CV71, #2 Summons Request) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
