David Loaiza v. Associated Production Music LLC et al
| David Loaiza |
| Does 1 to 10, inclusive and Associated Production Music LLC |
| 2:2021cv02594 |
| March 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| John F Walter |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Associated Production Music LLC. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff David Loaiza. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff David Loaiza, (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff David Loaiza. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30983460 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff David Loaiza. (Attorney Thiago Merlini Coelho added to party David Loaiza(pty:pla))(Coelho, Thiago) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
